That comes up with nothing. > At 04:56 PM 11/4/2004, you wrote: > >Mach-IV? > > > >Dan > > Yeah. It's twice as fast as Mach-II, and roughly 4 times as fast as > FuseBox 4. > > FuseBox uses the FuseDocs standard, which slows it down a little. With > Mach-IV, you get true MVC coding, together with "smart" caching that > is done through nested structs. > > I don't have the site handy, but do a search for "Mach 4 structs qry" > on Google and you'll find it. > > -- > A > > > > >On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:23:40 -0500, Alexander Sherwood > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 01:39 PM 11/4/2004, you wrote: > >> >Count me in!!! > >> > >> We switched to Mach-IV. > >> > >> It's like Mach-II, only twice as fast and a better, more robust > plugin architecture. > >> > >> It uses the better, more streamline XSLT2.0 W3C standard. > >> > >> -- > >> A > >> > >> >On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 12:51:08 -0400, Kwang Suh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> If people really want it, I'm going to write a very long, > detailed tutorial on using Mach-II sometime in December. I wasn't too > satified with the amount and quality of documentation out there. > >> >> > >> >> >I'm curious who is using Mach-II... > >> >> > > >> >> >Documentation and examples seems to be very minimal. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:183518 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
