reason why I'm interested is that I'm going to build 2 windows box to see how things go with transactional oeprations:
1. MX with apache and SQL Server 2. MX with IIS and SQL Server and if I'm really bored during the holidays ... compare it with 1.1 MX with apache and Oracle 9 or 10g 2.1 MX with IIS and Oracle 9 or 10g =) >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/2004 9:53:28 AM >>> Lawrence Ng wrote: >I wonder if the same would happen if one were to use Apache (if it's >IIS crashing or root of it in the first place) > > I'm using both at the moment (because it was driving me crazy trying to get CFMX 6.1 to even load an admin page without hanging up the machine a while back). Had it running CFMX for two or three weeks now and Apache works smooth and fine. So far. There were a lot of problems over the last year or so which I was blaming on CFMX (cursing it for being unusable since jumping to Java) but since I had the inspiration to try a different web server the other day when I HAD to run some CFM ... been wondering if I should have just been cursing Microsoft instead. At least in part. Anyway, to answer you, it does seem that (COM issues aside) all the problems I've been having with CFMX (at least recently) go away with Apache. Hrm. -- --Lewis Sellers (AKA min) Intrafoundation Software http://www.intrafoundation.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:184776 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
