> However, as far as debugging a shaky server, I stand by turning off CFX tags, at least until the problem is found.
I agree, it's always useful to eliminate as many things as soon as possible when debugging a shaky server where the cause isn't evident. > Great tag. It is the best one we've ever had. Thanks for the compliment... > I still wouldn't put it on our public-facing boxes. Why not? Do you have stability problems with it? If it were open source would you consider it? > "Steer clear of C++ CFX tags, unless they're Paul's." I wasn't fishing for that honest :) But thanks anyway.... Seriously though, my main theme is that if you don't know/trust the source then you need to thoroughly test before things go into production and also, as we have both agreed, problems aren't generally language dependent because bad code isn't language dependent. > My standard install has 158.. It would appear I counted a backup directory too... Paul ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185266 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
