On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:35:06 -0400, Jim Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The question is whether or not FireFox in mass use would reduce spyware -
> >> I'm not sure it would.  It very well might - I just don't know.
> >
> >IE installs software without your consent - so yes it would reduce it
> >(using logic and experience not stats). After I install firefox on
> >systems and run spybot a month or two later there isn't any spyware.
> 
> No it doesn't.

I am afraid it does. Run spybot on your system every once in a while,
bet you'll find some if you browse with IE - patch system or not

> 
> Or will we continue to compare the initial release of IE with the current 
> release of FireFox?  Anonymous installation of software was a bug.  A bug 
> that's been addressed.  Any software that took advantage of that bug is 
> legitimatly "viral" and can and should be caught by any off-the-shelf virus 
> checking software.
> 

So what you are saying is, those people who "can't install software"
are supposed to keep their system patched? IE will be a problem for a
long long time, because if you find a flaw in it you often get to 0wn
the whole box.


> I think we're all in agreement that the first step to good security is to 
> patch your systems as recommended by your vendor.  (Even the gentlemen in 
> Jochem's reference link admits that none of the software installed could have 
> been installed with a fully patched system.  Although I can't see what good 
> point can be made by testing on five year old, unpatched software.)
> 
> I think we can also all be agreement is that the second step in good security 
> is to run up-to-date virus checkers and firewalls.
> 

Thirdly run software that is well written, under active development,
and had something added to it this century.

> The argument, it seems to me, is not to switch to Firefox but rather to patch 
> your systems.  These are two very different things.
> 

You should always patch your systems (if it doesn't cause you computer
not to function doing so as sp2 did to my mom), and its a very good
move to use firefox if you don't want people to steal your on line
banking information :)


> Also, there will be spyware on many people's ForeFox machines because, just 
> as always, they can easily be tricked into installing it.  Can you (or, 
> humbly, I) be tricked?  Probably not - but that's not who we're talking about 
> - "the masses" definately can be and are.
> 

I have yet to find a piece of spy ware on my girlfriends or her bosses
computer after we moved them to firefox. I just don't think you are
talking form experience here.


> FireFox is a great browser, but it's not a panacea for bad human behavior.

True that

Cheers again Jim

-- 
~The cfml plug-in for eclipse~
http://cfeclipse.tigris.org
~open source xslt IDE~
http://treebeard.sourceforge.net
~open source XML database~
http://ashpool.sourceforge.net

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta
http://www.newatlanta.com

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:186315
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to