I think you are right and that they didn't really understand what they where talking about. I've been doing some digging about and I'm heading towards think that problem lays with the Apache connector. I might look into using the CF built in web server, anyone had any experience of doing it that way?
Andrew. On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:40:41 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Michael Greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok I gotcha now :) > > Technically yes J2EE server can function as a webserver, but I wouldn't > recommend doing that because its really not what it's meant to do. > > As far as the comment that was made to you it seems like they are confusing > J2EE and Apache. Yes you could have CF ride on top of Apache however I don't > think you can serve it on top of that. I don't think there are connectors > available to do so. (I did a quick look up for Tomcat, JBoss, Weblogic, or > WebSphere and didnt see them available) > > I definitely think that if you wanted to do anything on J2EE server I'd > recommend using JSPs and Servlets. > > Thanks, > Michael > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Dec 13, 2004 10:31 AM > To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Using a J2EE Application Server > > Hi. > > We are basically looking for a more robust platform on which to run > CF. We have a site with about 500,000 page view per day and every now > and again the CF server service will die and the only way we have > found to get it running again is to kill the CF server threads (using > the kill command) and then start it again, trying to stop the server > doesn't work. Some else suggested to a college that using CF on the > J2EE platform might help make it more robust, but we have zero > experience of the J2EE platform and we where using looking for a basic > intro into work it is, does and whether or not it might help. > > I understand the Apache is not a J2EE server, but I was wondering if > the J2EE server replaces the web server (like Apache) or if you still > use a web server as well. > > The server is Dual Xeon 2Ghz with 4Gb RAM and 80Gb IDE Hard Drive. The > average load on the machine never gets to high, but the CF server just > appears to full over sometimes. We are using CFMX6.1 + Updater, which > has improved the stability slightly. Any ideas? > > Andrew > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:17:46 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Michael Greenberg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > Not sure what you're asking...Apache is not a J2EE server, however a J2EE > > server like Tomcat or JBoss can ride on top of Apache. Are you looking for > > a full blown J2EE server that does EJB or just a JSP Container? One thing a > > J2EE server architecture will give you is force you to separate > > presentation and logic, but the same can be said about Fusebox I suppose. > > > > Can you give more info? > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Dec 13, 2004 9:56 AM > > To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Using a J2EE Application Server > > > > Hi All. > > > > I'm looking for a little bit of information. In what case would you > > use CFMX on a J2EE platform? We current have a server using CFMX & > > Apache on RedHat. What does using the J2EE platform give me and do the > > J2EE replace Apache as the webserver or do you still need that? > > > > Thanks for any information anyone can provide. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187383 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
