actually what set me off on "poor wills" original post was him saying that he could build a .net app faster then anyone could in cfm but then he says that its with this great $2500 program (when there are several free cfm ones). And he wasnt comparing apples to apples and if anyone thinks what he said was a valid statement, then ummm, okkkkkkkkkk
ppl get mad at me here, usually cause i stick up for cfm & thats fine & u all know what i think of ms (how was that jim ;) ), i just think ur crazy not to see what ms does and i'd be very scared to be thinking whats gunna happen the next time billy gets a brain storm and disses .net. but i know this, i will still be here coding cfm & laughing at ur azz while u go off on how great "sparkle" is or what ever their new "macromedia killer" is this time around. ok and something else, yes how a busy app runs is dependant on how its coded. someone brought up myspace.com, yes a huge traffic site which has continual problems because i dont think they know what they are doing! but then Macromedia.com run just fine, like there isnt anyone else on it. ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:48:16 -0500 >> Poor Will. All he wanted was a better ColdFusion. > >There are two problems with this statement. First, what he thinks is better >may differ from what others think is better. Second, his original post here >didn't really focus on what he wanted CF to do that it doesn't already do. >Instead, he posted a shrill warning that .NET is going to eat CF's lunch, or >something along those lines. He quoted some guy who said that .NET performs >better than CF - which hasn't been verified or disproven in my opinion - but >he didn't really list specific shortcomings of CF or suggest improvements to >it. He talked about Microsoft "baking new cakes", which isn't especially >helpful. > >If he really wants a better ColdFusion, he'd be better served by >specifically listing features that he wants to see, as you did. That doesn't >necessarily mean that those features will or should be included, but they'll >be discussed, and if enough people ask for them MM will put them in, >presumably. > >Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software >http://www.figleaf.com/ >phone: 202-797-5496 >fax: 202-797-5444 > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187475 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
