Well... between the two Windows 2003, but not for performance. Windows 2003 is simply more secure and reliable - it's reportedly "faster" but I don't think in ways that would really affect a WebSphere/CF application (which is much more bound by the speed of the JVM).
It also depends on your box. I assume if you can afford WebSphere you're not going to cheap-out in the hardware, but Windows 2003 does use more resources than Windows 2000 so if you're planning on an iffy box then you might want to use 2000 to squeeze slightly more out of it. All this being said we don't use either - since my company's collective head is squarely up IBM's ass we use AIX. ;^) Jim Davis > -----Original Message----- > From: Dobris, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 10:15 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Cold Fusion MX and Websphere > > If anyone is using this combination, Cold Fusion MX and Websphere, what > operating system do you recommend for best performance, windows 2000 or > windows 2003? > > Thanks, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187755 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
