On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:32:47 -0600, Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, if you want to pass or dump your local variables all you > have to use is the variables scope.
Variables scope is not the same as function local scope! > While a lot of what is being said was handy and even necessary under > v. 5 and before, some of it is outmoded and only adds overhead under > the new platform. Not sure what you're suggesting here but explicitly scope-qualifying variable references speeds up your code - it doesn't add overhead. > But, by and large, I prefer scoped vars prefixed, local vars implied > by lack of prefix, and as descriptive names as possible for > everything. Yup, sounds like we're in agreement there. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme Got Gmail? -- I have 6 invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:188759 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
