On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:44:53 -0500, Joe Rinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as FB4 vs. mach-ii performance goes, I don't have a > side-by-side app to compare with. However, I'd guess that any > noticeable performance difference is likely to be negated by the > overhead of the application you develop.
Yes, sort of. See the comments on this blog entry: http://www.corfield.org/blog/index.cfm?do=blog.entry&entry=6982F5D1-D176-D47C-D1FED9B36140E86F You can compare rendering times side-by-side using the FB4 URL and the hacked-together Mach II URL: site home page: http://www.corfield.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.main http://www.corfield.org/MachII/mach-ii.cfm?MACHII_CONFIG_PATH=/vservers/corfield/htdocs/config/mach-ii-cf.xml&event=bookstore.main&myself=x bookstore page: http://www.corfield.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=bookstore.main http://www.corfield.org/MachII/mach-ii.cfm?MACHII_CONFIG_PATH=/vservers/corfield/htdocs/config/mach-ii-cf.xml&event=bookstore.main&myself=x (Yes, this uses exactly the same model and view code for a Mach II app and a Fusebox 4.1 app) -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme Got Gmail? -- I have 6 invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189292 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
