On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:05:31 +0100, Micha Schopman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And that product synergy isn't the right way I think. It is like they
> are building products around Flash, and it is something they should not
> do with ColdFusion.

The world is about "solutions" not "products" so product synergy is
definitely the right way. As for CF integratiing with Flash, well, you
don't have to use those products - lots of people are very excited
about the Flash integration features: CF's feature set is being driven
by customers.

> MM should be careful, not focusing to much on Flash. Focus on the core
> product.

Er, Flash is the core product. Flash Player ubiquity. Flash authoring,
Flex, Breeze, Captivate (and several of the other Robo* products),
Flash Lite for cell phones. Hundreds of millions of installed players,
millions of developers. I'd say that CF's Flash integration makes it
the server scripting language of choice for Flash-based apps and that
ought to be a good thing...
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/
Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/
Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme
Got Gmail? -- I have 5 invites to give away!

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:190676
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to