Robert Everland III wrote: > If you are using SQL Server 2000 you can always use SQL Server JDBC drivers. > Who better than MS to know how to handle their own server. I did some testing > by looping through different types of queries such as inserts, updates and > selects and with just 1000 queries Microsoft JDBC drivers were a couple > seconds faster than the built in JDBC drivers.
pretty much everybody knows better than ms when it comes to JDBC & sql server. ms's JDBC driver originally came from datadirect & hasn't really progressed that far. and my own testing is exactly the opposite of your findings, ms's JDBC driver was the 3rd slowest i tested: #1 jTDS http://jtds.sourceforge.net/ #2 datadirect #3 ms JDBC ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware: a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:191638 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
