It's the modern HTML standard.  HTML 4.0 is still the most common, I'm
sure, but XHTML superceeded it.  It's not really any different, except
it forces you to separate content from presentation, and since it's
XML, allows you to do various nifty things in certain situations (such
as embedding other XML namespaces, or doing XSL transformations).

cheers,
barneyb


On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:43:01 -0500, Claude Schneegans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>I like it, because it's consistent with the XHTML I create.
> 
> Ok, but whats the big deal of XHTML after all?
> 
> 
-- 
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/

Got Gmail? I have 50 invites.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193034
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to