"Micha Schopman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > XHTML in general has to be served as application/xhtml+xml, > application/xml or text/xml to be valid. So serving the files with a > mimetype other than the required results in invalid XHTML, although the > format looks XHTML valid.
I tend to agree (see my CF tools page with a Gekko based browser), but I feel there is more than that. With XHTML you can create compound documents, mixing different XML languages inside the same document, like a XHTML file that contains SVG, MathML or RSS. In such a scenario XHTML may simply act as a container. How about that? What's the "correct" mime-type for such a kind of beast? I have the feeling a simple mime-type isn't able to express the real nature of a compound XML document... ---------------------------- Massimo Foti DW tools: http://www.massimocorner.com CF tools: http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/ ---------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193096 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
