On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:44:14 -0500, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it's not so much what it's compiled down to so much as the > version of the CF runtime that needs to interpret the byte code I > think.
The byte code is processed by the JVM - it is not interpreted by the CF runtime. However, you're sort of on the right track. There's a sufficient number of changes between CFMX 6.1 and CFMX 7 (this is, after all, a *major* release) that the compiled code is not compatible across the two versions due to differences in the CF runtime APIs and libraries. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193444 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
