Try the 2 links again. I had forgotten that cfttrace doesn't work unless you have debug priveledges.
Ive populated the execution times for the qoqs during runtime and used cfflush to spit them out in realtime Here is the app running on 6.1 (same server) http://eureka.ext.usu.edu/spider.cfm?q=61&c=test Here is the app running on 7 (same server) http://testext.usu.edu/spider.cfm?q=61&c=test On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:37:16 -0600, Aaron Rouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree that it is hard to answer the question, just wanted to point > out that I was noticing the differences in speed. > > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:31:09 -0000, Paul Vernon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The second link for me did take a noticeably longer time to load than the > > first. The first kind of came up almost immediately. > > > > Strange, I tested 2 or 3 times and it was about the same... I test now and > > there is a marked difference.... My comments however still stand. Without > > knowing how big the original data set is what the queries look like and also > > the not knowing exactly how the inner workings of QoQ function, it's a bit > > of a tricky question to answer as to whether there are any ways to improve > > the situation. > > > > Paul > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193532 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
