Actually, and I dont mean to trash Oracle here as I'm quite fond it. But.... MSSQL is a bit faster than Oracle on smaller data sets. Oracle doesn't beat MSSQL in performance until you hit 10ks of rows.
So technically it's underkill. :-P -Adam On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:57:42 -0500, Daniel Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:01 PM -0500 2/3/05, CF-Talk wrote: > >"Y'know, I use Oracle as the DBMS for my blog." > > > >"Isn't that kinda overkill?" > > > >"Yeah, but your should hear the server growl whenever somebody pulls up > >pictures of my cat!" > > yeah it is probably overkill, but it's what the University supports > and I use it whether I need to scale later or not. > > It's good to hear that it might not be too hard. It looked nice. > > -- > Daniel Kessler > > Department of Public and Community Health > University of Maryland > Suite 2387 Valley Drive > College Park, MD 20742-2611 > 301-405-2545 Phone > www.phi.umd.edu > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193718 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
