Hi, Cutter.  Let me see if I can help:

1. It's true that each developer using the development server needs to 
have his or her own DevNet subscription.
2. The scenario you mention below is definitely legitimate.  One of the 
advantages of the development server is that other people in the 
company, and even clients, can keep an eye on development.  (As long as 
they aren't actually writing code, or technically QAing the system, no 
problem.)
3. Now back to your main point: unfortunately, I don't have an answer, 
but I do have a contact for you.  I recommend emailing your question to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  That goes directly to DevNet business owners, 
so you will get a quick and accurate response.

Feel free to email me personally if you don't hear something back in a 
reasonable amount of time.

Thanks,
Christian

On Feb 9, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Cutter (CF related) wrote:

> I don't remember this restriction (not that it matters much in my
> organization). A more important advantage for us was the ability for 
> any
> of the 7+ members of our management staff could pull up a site in
> development from their desktop and gage it's progress without having to
> be at a specific workstation and without us having to place that
> developing site on a production server with our hosting provider.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193826
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to