No, but it was in response to your original question, "Do you know anyone that analyzes the quality of other peoples open source code? Anyone?"
I would argue that open source code is MORE analyzed than closed source. Especially if it is a critical/core component. Look at OpenBSD. They have a fantastic security record. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:22:34 +0100, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Austin wrote: > > Well, the Linux kernel for one is pretty heavily peer-reviewed. And > > thats even before it gets committed to the source tree, which largely > > is a final process overseen by Linus. So the kernel code is VERY > > heavily reviewed. > > And would the process for getting patches into AIX, Solaris or > Windows be very different? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194630 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
