> Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used inside a CFC. It > adds extra overhead and the protection that it provides should be provided > instead by the CFARGUMENT tag. Does anyone see a reason for it in such a > case? Data binding?
Besides the fact that security should be performed in layers, cfargument types do not correspond to SQL types. Also, I would generally *expect* parameterized queries to provide better performance than queries with inlined values. Parameterized queries can even provide better performance than stored procedures in some situations. Ben Rogers http://www.c4.net v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194813 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
