I've thought about that strategy, but I'm wondering how hard search
queries would be to write against that type of structure.  Another
thing I forgot to mention is that I have an XML file with all the
keywords and the pdf file name in it.  I'm wondering about keeping
appending these individual XML files into a larger "document type"
specific XML file.....


On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:43 -0400, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you build a custom collection in Verity, you can use one of the custom 
> fields in CFINDEX to write a list of matching keywords and values for each 
> document. That should work, but I'm not sure I like that solution from an 
> architectural viewpoint. I would rather have metadata in a structured format 
> and index against the structured format. Rather than build a table for each 
> document type, you could build a table for documents, a table for document 
> types, and build a table for document properties. Properties could be 
> different by document type, and each individual document could have its own 
> values for each document property. That's the way the Spectra application was 
> architected, and it is one of the things about Spectra I still use in legacy 
> Spectra apps I maintain.
> 
> >I've got a project right now where we're taking scanned documents and
> >running it through an OCR program. The documents also have keywords
> >attached to them.  The keyword types (ie. location_state,
> >meeting_date, meeting_type) are different depending on the document
> >type (ie. contract, meeting minutes, invoice).
> >
> >I need to make an interface that will both search keywords and full
> >text searches on the documents.  Both will be done exclusively, not at
> >the same time.  The full text search doesn't seem to be a problem with
> >the verity engine.  The keyword search bugs me.  I could make a table
> >for each document type, but that doesn't seem very "clean".  Is there
> >a way to use these keywords in verity?
> >
> >Also, if one of the keywords is a date, can verity do searches like
> >"date < 1/1/2005"?
> >
> >--
> >G-mail must not realize I'm and anti-social nerd, it keeps telling me
> >to "Invite 50 friends to Gmail"
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:196025
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to