Yeah, I hear that. I suspect that more clusters use session affinity than you suspect, and just accept that failover scenarios aren't as good. The server cluster we built a couple years ago doesn't use session affinity (an intentional design characteristic), but we're finding that there are more reasons to have it than to avoid it, so we're in the process of switching. Which isn't to say that CFC replication wouldn't be nice to have, but I'd say raw CFC serialization would be a bigger boon.
cheers, barneyb On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:41:50 -0500, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, that's a pretty sad oversight on the part of Macromedia. > Basically, if you use any session-based CFCs you are forced to use > sticky sessions. And even that doesn't help at all for failover. They > added a lot of nice stuff in 7.0, but they also dropped the ball on > several things and this is one of them. -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:196346 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
