So, say, in terms of a wiki... strong would be viable for "terms" while em would suffice for meta-information like last-updated-by:
Blah blah blah <strong>wiki term</strong> blah blah blah <strong>the end of the world</strong> blah blah blah <strong>Douglas Adams</strong> <em>Entry created by Fred Smith, last updated on March 19, 1963, by John Anderson</em> In other words, strong would act as a callout and em would be used to provide details for the entire entry. Is that the idea? J On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:33:22 +0100, Micha Schopman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At first I would say yes, EM would be a good candidate, however I would > reserve EM for larger code blocks. Like a note, a warning, etc. > > This part states you might better use strong for it. But honestly, I > wouldn't care while both have their semantics in letting content stand > out. > > "Thus, it would be logical to define that em emphasizes the enclosed > text with respect to the text in the enclosing element and should be > rendered in a manner that reflects this; whereas strong (renamed to e.g. > key or highlight, if we give up continuity, as planned for XHTML 2.0) > would indicate its content as key word or phrase in the context of the > entire document, to appear as highlighted when possible, and to gain > special weight in indexing." > > > Micha Schopman > Project Manager > > Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort > Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 > KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ----- > Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren > de interactie met uw doelgroep. > Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer > informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ----- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting > > Hmm, would <em> be more appropriate in that context? > > - Calvin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting > > When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using <strong> for > highlighting. Not span. > > Micha Schopman > Project Manager > > Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort > Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 > KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ----- > Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren > de interactie met uw doelgroep. > Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer > informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ----- > > - > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198653 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
