I used CF as an example as comparison to value for money, comparing
functionality to price not a fair example I know:-)
regards
Andrew Scott
ANZ eCommerce Centre
* Ph 9273 0693
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 September 2000 13:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hotel Booking Engine up
just 2 cents ....... I did a CF stock program and the same thing sells for
about 5000.00 a month
(what i charged is irrelevant)
from a competitor and it was done in ASP but the server that runs asp is
free too..... so not sure about what the cost of cold fusion server has to
do with anything. maybe marketing our products for a higher price should be
done off this list.........what ya think?
<CF_GRIN>
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Gooden (Annex)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 7:26 PM
Subject: RE: Hotel Booking Engine up
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 7:09 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: Hotel Booking Engine up
>
> You brought up too many juicy points, so I couldn't resist to add another
to
> this thread <grin>.
>
>
>
>
> > That is a fair comment to make, and I can say that the
> > experince is the same
> > here. I do contract work for companies who require my
> > services, and the code
> > I use always is written from scratch, for legal reasons. But
> > because I have
> > done it once before or even twice before I find that I can complete it
> > faster the next time I need to do it, not to mention its
> > always better the
> > next time around as well.
>
> Indeed!
>
> > However without getting into any legal issues, I can look at
> > something and
> > see how its written without looking at the code. This makes
> > me unique in a
> > way I guess, because I find that it saves me a lot of trouble
> > buying things
> > when I can write the code from what I see on the screen in terms of
> > functionality.
>
> So you agree that when it comes to development, there's the writing of
code,
> and then there's the METHOD and USER INTERFACE that suddenly comes into
the
> picture.. (This can distinguish one developer from another actually).
>
> We could both write a "Hello World" application, and I'm willing to bet
that
> they'd look VERY different in terms of method and look (because we're two
> different people with different "angles" on it).
>
>
> > So that it why I made the origianl comment, I have been
> > programming now for
> > 20 years, and in this time I have seen MANY shareware or
> > modules like this
> > one where I belive the price to be too high, only because I
> > know the that
> > the cost it would take me to do it would be far less, it
> > would also work the
> > way I want it to work and I would also have the source code
> > to play with as
> > well and could make the changes etc without the support of a
> > 3rd person.
>
> But what you're really saying (imho) is that you look at price (we're not
> talking about value at this point) as a direct function of raw cost... I
> have more points to make about that below..
>
>
> > We now live a world that is connected by wires, geographic
> > location and
> > expereince don't really come into the picture. If I had the
> > time, I could
> > clean up my code to be released just as this person did and
> > have it sell for
> > $1000 (Aus) which is about $500 (us) we will always be
> > competing on a world
> > scale, so just because it took someone 1 hour or 20 hours is
> > not an issue,
> > demand is not an issue but being competative is.
>
> Correct! You see lots of "overseas" development houses out there.. Some
are
> good, some are not (just like dev houses or developers IN the US)...
>
> Supply and Demand certainly change as you widen the scale to a global
> economy.
>
>
> > All I am saying is that when marketing something, look at
> > Microsoft for
> > instance. If MS was to sell the Windows products nobody could
> > afford them,
> > because the R&D into developing these would be too high and
> > nobody would buy
> > the product. Good marketing is knowing how to sell your
> > product, and not get
> > a quick buck out of it.
>
> Here's where the meat of MY comments are.
>
> If Microsoft was going to make you a custom application, they'd charge a
> MUCH higher price than we are talking about here.. but what MS counts on
is
> VOLUME. Volume creates a "long term" financial scenario that permits them
to
> sell you windows98 for a lowly 89 bux.
>
> So back to this app that started the thread... The trick isn't "how much
> could I make it for", the REAL trick is, "How do I maximize my income from
> this work?".
>
> That's where you make the jump from a developer to a businessperson.
>
> Let's say I make a WIDGET, and it cost me 100,000 dollars to spec,
develop,
> market and support for the first year.
>
> If the widget is CUSTOM (1 customer), clearly I'm going to charge OVER
that
> amount so that I can make profit. Let's say in that scenario I charge
> 200,000.00 so I can make a profit of 100,000.00.
>
> But if I can sell that widget to multiple customers, why not sell it at
> 49.95? (this is presuming that I believe I can sell at least 5000 copies
of
> the software)... If you saw that the math is different (4004 copies
required
> to equal the first deal), you'll note that selling multiple copies
involves
> more costs, so that's where this hypothetical curve exists.
>
>
> > I mean would you buy an application written in Coldfusion
> > that cost more
> > than CF itself, I know I wouldn't and would prefer to program
> > it myself. I
> > just wanted to point out that it may have taken 20-100 hours
> > to develop but
> > there are applications out there that took maybe 50 times
> > longer with 1000
> > times more functionality for less than the price of this
> > application. People
> > tend to foget this when setting a price for their products:-)
>
>
> Amazingly enough, we sell a packaged application that is cheaper than
> ColdFusion (operating under the "volume model" mentioned above), and found
> that if we were TOO cheap, we sold less. Companies didn't like that the
> application was less than the required OS software. Wierd eh?
>
>
> > Anyway thats all I need to say on this subject.
>
> Sorry I continued it.. It struck home on stuff that I've been operating
out
> of for years now. :)
>
> Gregory
> Your Mileage May Vary...
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> annex.com, Inc. - http://www.annex.com/
> -------------------------------------------
> - If you EcoBuild it, they will come. -
> - http://www.ecobuilder.com/ -
> -------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
