Typos, typos... i=i+1, for one... not i=1+1.
And as far as preferring the JS-style syntax in cfscript, it's a style thing. It looks better and is less cluttered... I definitely use more tag-style code than cfscript, but I also use cfscript wherever I can simply to produce cleaner, more readable code. On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:14:18 -0600, Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do see your point... and further, I still disagree... > > With all due respect, && is the AND comparison operator. > > And == is the IS comparison operator. > > My point was that JS isn't all that hard to read and write once you learn it. > <snip> > += would be a nice operator to have in CF... and yet it must be said > with i=1+1... hence some things are easier to write in JS than in CF. > And for me, often, I'd *rather* use JS-style syntax in CFSCRIPT. Why? > Because the JS syntax is more concise, and in general faster (though > CFSCRIPT no longer provides better performance per se, the concise > code it can produce reduces the code written under some > circumstances). > -- Continuum Media Group LLC Burnsville, MN 55337 http://www.web-relevant.com http://www.web-relevant.com/blogs/cfobjective ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:200135 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
