Thanks for the clarification, guys. (And I'll never spell applicAtion.cfc with a lowercase A again.) :)
-----Original Message----- From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: this scope On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:28:43 -0700, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been avoiding the "this" scope in my CFCs after reading several blogs > and posts on the topic. Is that still the best practice in CFMX 7? I ask > because all the examples I see of application.cfc set and refer to > this.name, this.applicationTimeout, etc. Application.cfc (capital A!) is one of those special cases where magic happens behind the scenes so you have to use 'this' scope for the attributes that are equivalent to <cfapplication>. In pretty much all other cases you should avoid 'this' scope since it represents public instance data - and public data is a Bad Thing(tm) because it does not provide encapsulation. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:200806 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
