Always nice to see a new comrade crawl out of the woodwork. :)

I have to say, though, I'm kind of conflicted over the idea of adding
lists to the array of available choices...

(CF is leaking into my conversational speech... ugh.)

Anyway... I tend to think that more choice is a good thing. I also
tend to think that fragmentation is bad. I can understand the thought
process on both sides of the issue.

I thought, a while back when it came up, that a CF-OOP list here at
HoF would't be a bad idea. I'm still not sure it IS a bad idea. I'm
already on 4 HoF lists, and it's sort of the global CF mailing list
clearinghouse. I do, completely understand the arguments against it,
though...

CFCDev is out there. While it may not be as heavily trafficked as the
HoF lists, it does its job. I dunno... I tend to think that
archtecture (systems), design (components/patterns), and development
(code) are all different enough that it warrants separate containers
for discussion. What's not OT in the design category is conceivably
entirely OT in the architecture category. I know they're all related,
and indeed I can see value in crossover conversations between them.

I still tend to think it may not be a bad idea to have some more options.

Something to think about, anyway...

Laterz,
J


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:22:07 +1000, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Joe points out CFCDev is the happy-joy-land in terms of this
> subject, - be warned stay on topic - as i'm popping in / out of this
> list a lot over the years and see quite a lot of bantering/thread
> hijacking/flaming etc  back and forth (more power to the list i guess
> we are all stressed hehehe) but i like CFCDev for staying ontopic
> 99.9% of the time - which is a good trait.
> 
> That being said, creating lists such as the ones you outlined would be
> to fragemented in my opinion, i'd like to see it more consolidated to
> a list like CFCDev where patterns and all that which is OO goodness is
> given a healthy kick. Over the past few months, a lot of us i guess
> have gotten love stricken with the concepts of
> DAO/DG/Managers/Mach-II/Beans-OR-BusinessObjects/Factory Patterns and
> what not.. i myself went a bit pattern frenzy  but thats cool as it
> opens up to possibilities of how to architect now vs just code.
> 
> I wish more people would create blogs on the very subject and air
> there thoughts as its been sucessful for devs like Joe, Matt and many
> many others (myself included) to bare ones soul about their
> knowledge/learning experience on OO development with CFMX.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes 


-- 
Continuum Media Group LLC
Burnsville, MN 55337
http://www.web-relevant.com
http://www.web-relevant.com/blogs/cfobjective

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:200934
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to