abstracted from the user: you dont call application.cfc play book: way of doing something
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April 2005 15:12 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Use THIS scope or not? Thanks for your response Michael. I have seen endless discussion of the "this" scope for months. I wrote the question I did, because I am confused. Use "this" or not? I've read all that stuff, and now I dont know what to do. What does "... abstracted from the user thus require a different play book." mean? What's abstracting mean in this context? What's a "play book"? Cheers Mike Kear Windsor, NSW, Australia Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer AFP Webworks http://afpwebworks.com ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month On Apr 1, 2005 11:27 PM, Michael T. Tangorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike, > > This exact question was disucssed earlier this week, check the archives. > Application.cfc is an exception to the CFC best practices as a lot of its > functionality are abstracted from the user thus require a different play > book. > > Mike ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:201170 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
