> Would we get a substantial performance boost on a process > intensive series of CF tasks if we converted them into > Java? ( assuming of course it was done properly ).
> Right now we have a emailing system that takes quite a bit > of time to finish. I'm wondering if we brought the > majority of processes into Java if that would help us out. If your java code made use of the ability to spawn new threads, sure, you might see a significant performance boost. Might... you might not... I don't have deep personal knowledge on the subject of sending email with Java -- so I don't know if there are bottlenecks (common resources that need to be single-threaded) which would prevent a performance boost. I wouldn't expect them, but I could be wrong. Alternatively, if you've upgraded to MX 7 enterprise you could simply use the Asynchronous gateway to achieve the same result while staying within CFML (and as a result having access to <cfmail> so you could keep most of your existing code). s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://macromedia.breezecentral.com/p49777853/ http://www.sys-con.com/author/?id=4806 http://www.fusiontap.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:201890 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
