On Apr 8, 2005 9:04 AM, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How's CFMX 7 been running for everyone? Solid or does it have some
> show-stoppers that would keep us at 6.1?

First off I'll say that CFMX 7 is the same core code as CFMX 6.1 with
all the updaters and bug fixes - and a bunch of independent new
features.

macromedia.com has been running CFMX 7 since launch and we have been
running all our order management on CFMX 7 since early December
(pre-launch). It's been good for us.

When we upgraded, we hit a couple of issues that were in all but one
case bugs in CF61 that our code relied on (using <cfbreak> in a
<cfcase> that is not inside a loop - illegal in CF5, legal in CF61,
illegal in CF7; sending multipart email using plain <cfmail> tags -
worked in CF61 even tho' it introduced <cfmailpart>, no longer works
in CF7). The one case that wasn't a bug in CF61 that bit us was the
introduction of a new function, isValid() - we had a couple of places
where we had our own isValid() method which of course became invalid
in CF7.
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/
Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away!

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:202004
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to