Calvin Ward wrote: > I fail to see what is wrong with Flashpaper, it has a smaller footprint and > can be easily embedded in pages, and is supported by more browsers than PDF > is.
Are you talking about executable footprint or file footprint? If it's executable footprint, then that's just because Acrobat is, well, bloated. You can embed PDFs in pages--that is, after all, what the <object> tag is for--it's just that there's no good reason to (nor can I see a good reason to embed FlashPaper in a page). And then there's browser support: last time I looked, it was the other way round with PDF renderers that are embeddable into browsers being more common than Flash plug-ins. K. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:203279 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
