dave wrote: > That's just silly.
If you look at it from Adobe's point of view, it's not so silly. > Everyone who's been using flashpaper on the sites I use it on rave about. > You may not like it but the uses sure do, slick, clean, fast, no adobe > plugin necessary, sure it needs a flash one but who doesn't have that? I shall avoid. And I don't think it has much life left, not even as a "PDF lite", seeing as if Adobe wanted to create a light version of Reader, they could. The problem with PDF isn't the file format itself (which is quite well engineered), but Reader. As I said, having two file formats that do the same thing (almost: PDFs at least use outline fonts where available or embedded) isn't all that much use to Adobe. K. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:203340 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
