I could see someone using the server scope for this.... -----Original Message----- From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:23 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Performance
The latter, it would be totally unmanageable otherwise... -----Original Message----- From: Chad McCue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 May 2005 14:25 To: CF-Talk Subject: CF Performance I will be developing a site that will be on its own dedicated server running coldfusion 7 enterprise. This site will allow people to register and once they are registered it will develope a template site for them based on the domain name they choose. There will be about 2000 registered users each with their own template all running the same functions. My question is what would be more taxing on the server, to have 2000 seperate instances of the same cfcs for each site or to have one main folder with all the cfcs and each 2000 template sites running them. Each website will be hitting one main database. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:205655 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
