> NO!!!!!! There are awful table aliases which mean nothing. It is just > plain ugly to abbreaviate them like this... at the very least you should > qualify the name in some way....table a, b,c and d is just lazy.
Woah, lean back, take a deep breathe then pop a pill. It's too early in the week to criticize coding methods from an EXAMPLE It's easier to understand in an example that says a.something b.something than it is in one that says... somedatasourceoverhere.something andthisone.something If it was your datasource and tables, then the latter may make a little more sense to you. agreed? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:206077 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
