Right, I'm not thinking about the server side validation, but more about the client-side validation that various CFFORM tags write (CFINPUT, CFSELECT, etc.)
How does this JavaScript fare from a browser-compatibility and standards-compliance perspective? Is it the same old bloated code that CF used to write, or has it been dramatically improved? Thanks, Evan On 6/7/05, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In particular I wouldn't rely on the serverside validation option as it > requires client side code to trigger the validation, which of course defeats > one purpose of true server side validation (which is not to rely on the > client). > > - Calvin > > > On 6/7/05 9:24 AM, "Evan Lavidor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For a long time I never used the CFFORM controls because they tended > > to write bloated JavaScript and non-standards compliant code. > > > > I'm now upgrading to CF7, and am looking at all the new cool things > > with Flash forms and XForms, which all require CFFORM. > > > > So, my basic questions are, is CFFORM safe to use again? Are people > > using it for non-Rich/XForm code? Is the JavaScript better? etc. > > etc.... > > > > I'm curious what people's experiences with it are. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Evan > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:208890 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
