On 6/13/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would expect the other way around - can you explain? On a windows server > the UNC would sometimes involve a lookup through a sequence of services > (lmhost, then wins, then DNS then broadcast) whereas the map drive "should" > cache that information. They also use a differenct ipc mechanism.... what's > your reasoning?
>From my experience, a mapped drive is faster than a UNC, most probably for the reasons Mark mentions above. -- Eddie. http://awads.net/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:209480 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
