Adrocknaphobia wrote: >> From: Adrocknaphobia >>> >>> Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very >>> good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is >>> using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text >>> size.
> Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other areas for 508 > that I've tested. So when Mozilla can't resize a tiny part of the page, it is lacking, but when IE can't resize anything on the page, the website is to blame? The User Agent Accesibility Guidelines specifically say that a user agent should give final control over the rendering (including font size) to the user. So when we have section508.gov, Mozilla and IE, which one has the big glaring mistake? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210015 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
