Oh, absolutely, I was just illustrating that the nomenclature is still alive and well in the CF7 docs, which is what Sean was arguing against. No matter how clearly it's explained, the nomenclature still exists.
On 6/20/05, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you notice, within that page, they make it very clear that the way they > mean persistant is in regards to page requests. If that isn't made clear to > a *vast* majority of IT personel, than alot of confusion can come from it. > > <cfif Tech.writers NEQ cf.developers> > <cfdump var="#misleading.docs#"> > </cfif> > > Cheers, > > Kevin -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210053 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
