The scenario could also be created by using CFINCLUDEs, I would imagine. M!ke
-----Original Message----- From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:19 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: terms: shared scope variables vs. persistent scope variables? Your second <!-request-> block has two page scopes. Are you considering pageContext.forward() to create that scenario, or something else? cheers, barneyb On 6/21/05, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/21/05, Johnny Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, Sean, if they are not "persistent", then all scopes (session, application, server, cookie) are "shared" scope? So "shared" here means sharing among requests and not among users? > > Server and application scopes are shared among users. Session scope is > shared among requests. Request scope is shared among pages. > > If you think of it in terms of lifetimes, it's probably easier to "see": > > <-------------- server ----------------------------------> > <------------ application -------------------------> > <-------- session ---------------------------> > <-- request --> <-- request -----------> > <-- page --> <- page -><- page -> > > page = 'variables' scope on a CFM page > > (I think those lines should make it clear but ASCII art is not my > strong suit!) > -- > Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- > http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give > away! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210126 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
