> Has anyone tried alternate XML parsers? Is there a way to use > them without over-writing the default parser? Honestly, I'm > thinking about doing this is .Net, where the native parser > nails this 14MB file in about .7 seconds. Another other > suggestions?
You can install as many XML parsers as you want. However, you won't be able to use the built-in XML functionality that CF provides when using another parser - you'll have to use Java or whatever the parser is written in. This shouldn't be too difficult to do with a Java SAX parser, but I haven't tried. In addition, using a SAX parser is a bit more complicated than a DOM parser, since you have to process nodes as they're read by the parser. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:211043 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
