> Thanks S. Isaac Dealey > Yes. I need to use FSO with CF(CreateObject). But what I > need to setup > in our Win2003 Server. With Java I'll get best results?
> Thanx once more again. I would expect the java classes like java.io.File to be more efficient when using ColdFusion version 6.1 or later. (On version 5 the windows scripting object might be more efficient.) But asside from efficiency, the java classes are more portable since they can be used on any CF app platform, whether that's windows, linux, solaris or some unsupported JBoss instance on a SCO Unix machine. Reflection of the java classes when using ColdFusion 6.1 or later is amazingly efficient in and of itself when you're not relying on the CF native tags like cfdirectory which returns a bunch of information you may or may not need / want about the collection of files in your directory. Cfdirectory is great for the sake of simplicity, but if you really need performance, digging out the underlying java classes is the way to go. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:211366 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
