One possibility for "using CFMX Admin" is to not use the CFMX Admin GUI. You can edit the neo*.xml files then deploy them to configure CFMX, without using the CFMX Admin GUI.
We did this on a WebSphere cluster because the CFMX Admin settings won't progagate across the cluster. However, a script can push the neo*.xml files out quite easily. Chris Norloff ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Mosh Teitelbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:43:51 -0400 >All: > >Thanks for the replies. > >I don't think the admin is a "CFMX hater," just someone who has enough on >his hands managing their WebLogic boxes without having to learn another >management interface (the CF Admin). And, as someone who wishes he had more >free time on his hands, I can't find fault with that. > >While I get the distinction between "pure" Java and an appserver-specific >extension, I think I had been expecting a bit more in terms of deploying >CFMX7 apps on J2EE servers. I think it was back in February that BF wrote a >CFDJ article basically saying that J2EE server admins would no longer have >to jump through hoops to deploy CFMX7 apps. Having read the document at the >URL that Robert provided, I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. > >-- >Mosh Teitelbaum >evoch, LLC >Tel: (301) 942-5378 >Fax: (301) 933-3651 >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:42 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: CFMX7 Integration with J2EE - How complete is the integration? >> >> >> Technically, I believe your client's admin is correct. Take a >> look at this page on installing CFMX 7 in J2EE mode with WebLogic. >> >> http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/j2ee/cfmx7j2ee_weblog >> ic_deploy.html >> >> One component of ColdFusion is a J2EE servlet application that >> compiles CFML into JSP files and executes them. That part of >> ColdFusion could be called "pure Java". ColdFusion also contains >> other components- the ODBC services and the Search service, for >> instance, which are not pure Java- they aren't even Java at all. >> >> My re-collection from a conversation a couple of years ago at MAX >> was that Macromedia was thinking about putting out a "pure J2EE" >> implementation of ColdFusion without the non-Java components- an >> edition that would deploy and run on any J2EE server on any >> platform. I don't know if that plan ever came to fruition; I >> don't see it listed as a product edition on the Macromedia site. >> >> Rob >> >> >All: >> > >> >I have a client that, for reasons that much matter, wants to move one of >> >their CF apps to a J2EE server (running BEA WebLogic). The server's >> >administrator is adamant that only "pure" J2EE applications may >> be deployed >> >on this server. >> > >> >My understanding of CFMX7's capabilities with this respect is that the >> >EAR/WAR files it creates are "pure." However, the admin says >> that CF still >> >doesn't natively integrate with BEA's management console. >> > >> >So, what's the deal? Does CFMX7 offer "true" integration or just better >> >integration that its predecessor? >> > >> >TIA >> > >> >-- >> >Mosh Teitelbaum >> >evoch, LLC >> >Tel: (301) 942-5378 >> >Fax: (301) 933-3651 >> >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:211525 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
