I have a cache similar to the cf_scopecache, though my objects can be stored to file, memory as text, memory as a query, or memory as a cfc.
I have a gallery cfc which holds an array of photo cfc instances. Real simple, an id, file path, folder path, and friendly names for both object types. They really helped performance but they seem to hog memory. How much atypical (not your avg java object) overhead do cfc's add to traditional java objects, if any? Just trying to make sure I am making the correct assumptions about CFC's .... Thanks -Dov ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:212700 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
