Personally, I rely on what I call the step:func method ... all pages contain
their own HTML and CFML Processing code.
You start with step=1 then each form increases the step=x by 1 then you
isolate processing based on the "step" you're in. The func comes in when
inside a "step" to break down the processing even further.
So you could say:
step=2&func=edit or step=2&func=delete or step=3&func=add (When step 2 is a
database related function)
That way I always know what page is processing what logic, because it's all
contained on the same page. If there are multiple forms and one of the forms
exists on multiple pages, then I put the logic at the head of the output
page and process the logic just before the output. I also use the
header/footer method from fusebox and try and include as much as possible
into those pages.
That's my "methodology" -- fully open to criticizm or whatever you want to
say. Bottom line is, it works for me and I have no problems with it. A
development company I used to work for used that method and it's simple, to
the point and effective.
Joshua Miller
Web Site Development
Eagle Technologies Group
Business Solutions for the Next Generation
www.eagletgi.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Lott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fusebox [CF-Talk]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>However, it, like fusebox takes a lot longer to do.
>
Can't we all just get along? Everyone should write however they want to.
Some of us actually find Fusebox much quicker to develop in. Others
don't. That will never change.
I'd personally prefer to see more discussion about different
methodologies, which might help all of us. Many allude to their own
methods, but concrete explanations are often missing. I've tried, and
failed, to make sense of CFobjects, for example. \
These discussions occur not because there is any single best way to
code, but because CF's ease of use has allowed a lot of people who are
not programmers by profession (or nature :) to get into web application
development, and many of us don't have the skills to create a method of
our own. I personally NEED some direction to make better code and look
for the gurus on these lists to help!
c
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 for message encryption and authentication: USE PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x51046CFD
iQA/AwUBOckCKtaLYehRBGz9EQK3sACePIJHySnukw0Z6dYXzH5tL+8A514AoLNy
QQNl3xq93XjFEfmSuAZUWokI
=cZls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
