I like FB with a CFC layer for application logic for small sites. It provides enough structure without being overkill. OO frameworks are fine for even small sites once you become familiar with them, but there is a bit of a learning curve to OO programming.
>I don't want to get into a huge debate about it, but FB is really a >pretty bad application framework. It's very well suited to >markup-based UIs (XHTML, in particular), but for actually implementing >application logic, it's got some serious shortcomings. Model-Glue or >Mach-II is much better suited for that, since it lets you decouple the >UI from the application proper. You can get a similar effect with >service CFCs behind fusebox, though it's a little more free form >(which is both good and bad). > >cheers, >barneyb > >On 7/26/05, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I use fusebox everyday, but I dont think it's well suited for web >> sites. It's an application framework. >> >> -Adam >> > >-- >Barney Boisvert >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >360.319.6145 >http://www.barneyb.com/ > >Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:212890 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
