I would like to add that MM has been very cool, and very helpful with the CFEclipse project so far. They have some good ideas for features and project direction.
(I re-read my previous post and it seemed a bit crass which was totally unintentional) On 8/2/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > :) yikes..all this talk of weapons and arsenals, I thought I'd repeat what we > actually said at the conference: > > We're signed up to be yet another contributor to the CFEclipse project. > That's pretty much it. Just like the CF team helps support CF development in > HomeSite+ and DW, we think it makes sense to help developers wanting to > develop in CFEclipse have a good experience as well. There's stuff we think > we might be able to help out with that would be difficult to do properly > without us, and we want folks to have a good development experience with > CFEclipse and CF, for sure. > > If you look longer term, we've already said Zorn will be Eclipse-based, so it > might also makes sense that the CF team would be interested in helping make > sure that if you're using an Eclipse-based environment for Zorn work, for > example, you have a good development environment to build Zorn/CF apps in one > space. > > Again, though, we're just helping out...we don't want to own or run the > CFEclipse project, and I think the folks running the project would tell you > the same: we've been very respectful of their ownership of the project, and > our position as a contributor. We have helped come up with some ideas and > suggestions, but not any more or less than I think any other contributor has. > We also bring to the table some of our know-how in supporting various > editors for CF development, we're pretty good at writing specs, managing > projects, delivering quality code, etc, so hopefully we can help make > CFEclipse better through our participation. That's really the only goal. > > We've already started the process of identifying the features that are most > wanted/needed that we can uniquely help out with, and hopefully you'll see > some of this become more discussed in the next few weeks as we flush some of > this out. > > Damon > > > > For those who took the time out to head to CFUnited - what was/is > > the deal > > > with MM and it's support of CFUnited? Could it spell the end of DW > > as a > > > bloatware ColdFusion development tool? Is this just another weapon > > in the > > > Abobe (cough) arsenal? Will CFEclipse remain free!?! > > > > It's another weapon. I did a presentation a while ago in San Diego > > along with Angela Buraglia (dreamweaver) about what the difference is > > between DW and CFE and how they work together for different purposes > > (http://www.robrohan.com/blog/index. > > cfm?mode=entry&entry=51312C07-11B6-114F-257A14F2446322C0) > > for the presentation (sorry it's quite old) > > -- ~Blog~ http://www.robrohan.com ~The cfml plug-in for eclipse~ http://cfeclipse.tigris.org ~open source xslt IDE~ http://treebeard.sourceforge.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:213523 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
