I've recently begun updating one of our web apps- adding some new features, improving the coding style, and taking advantage of some of the new CF7 features.
One form was laid out in a nested-table layout, with HTML and CFM controls mixed in. I rewrote it using a CF7 XML format with cfformgroup tags, and execution time went through the roof. I rewrote the queries on the page to use cached results, and managed to get execution time down to about 11000 ms, on average, according to the debug information. I changed the format back to HTML, and execution time sank to about 250 ms. I chopped the form down to a very bare-bones layout, but the execution time increace was roughly the same. Now, there's nothing requiring me to use an XML format here, so I'll likely switch to HTML and replace the table layout with DIV's. The Label attribute of cfinput and <cfformgroup> are convieniences, to be sure, but not requirements. I'm just curious to see if anyone else has seen this. Is this normal, or is there likely a misconfiguration on my server? I'd expect a performance hit using XML format versus HTML, but the scale I'm seeing seems a bit excessive. Matt Osbun Web Developer Health Systems, International ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:213857 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
