Nothing. Hence you'll be hard pressed to see me ever use the term "ajax", instead preferring "JS Remoting". ; )
I believe (not being a buzzword maven) that "ajax" is not just the async XML passing, but also the UI design technique as a whole, so it'd include the DHTML and dynamic document rewriting stuff as well as the actual remoting calls. cheers, barneyb On 8/9/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting... > > I've done a good deal of asynch work with JS... none of it with "AJAX" > and hadn't really seen a need for it in all honesty... the only thing > that I'd heard about AJAX that even made me remotely consider the > possibility that at some point in the remote distant future it might > be semi-useful in some obscure way for some one-off task was the use > of XML. :P > > Seriously tho... if you're using AJAX but not using XML, what's to > differentiate that from simply using JS? (Asside from the buzz-word > appeal.) > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:214228 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
