Vince, Have there been any specific reasons you know of for taking such a proprietary approach or was it mainly aimed towards best performance because of its close integration?
Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- -----Original Message----- From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 15 augustus 2005 13:33 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Ajax and CFCs Jim, The WebORB implementation doesn't use SOAP or web services to invoke CFCs on BlueDragon--instead, WebORB invokes them directly via BlueDragon's internal APIs. Also, WebORB works with both the Java/J2EE and .NET editions of BlueDragon. Vince Bonfanti http://blog.newatlanta.com New Atlanta Communications, LLC http://www.newatlanta.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 1:04 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Ajax and CFCs > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:51 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Ajax and CFCs > > > > There is nothing there that couldn't be done with CFMX (or > any other > > server language). > > > > It is a simple request / response using AJAX. JavaScript > sends data to > > ColdFusion, ColdFusion sends a response back, JavaScript > updates the page. > > My guess (nothing more) is that it the same problem that > other SOAP implementations have: they don't like each other. > > MS implementations work great with .NET service but bomb on > CFMX services for example. CF implementations work great in > some places and blow up in others... > > In my experience these problems, once dug out, are pretty > small - but that doesn't matter because it seems the > implementers don't really care all that much - it works for > what they want it to work with and everybody else can just > toe the line or use something else. > > It's also very likely (because SOAP isn't all that simple) > that they're using some off-the-shelf implementation inside > this thing. And if that implementation doesn't support CF > SOAP/WSDL then this thing won't. > > Jim Davis > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:214968 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
