Jim Davis wrote: > Are ALL the CFC's in the extension chain in a web accessible directory? If > not then the "remote" access type bombs.
yes, i tested that, no go. only thing i can guess at is that the base CFC has no remote methods. its not that i mind using a "facade" CFC (is that the right word??) much as some of methods are dual purpose already, adding in goop to handle the flash remoting seemed messy, but i'm not sure i *have* to do it that way. thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215240 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
