Did you try cf_sql_bit or cf_sql_integer? Not boolean, I know, but those seem like they'd have a better chance of working right than a CHAR value (which presumably CF uses as a default for unknown types, rather than erroring).
cheers, barneyb On 8/23/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, I just noticed that there isn't a documented cf_sql_boolean type > for use with stored procedures. If you use it, though, it doesn't fail > to compile, and it converts it to a cf_sql_char. But, with my stored > proc in Oracle 10g - it's not going in as a boolean. (I get the error > about wrong number or type of paramaters.) > > Does anyone know if there's a workaround that will really send a > boolean to the stored proc, or do I need to alter my stored proc to > not expect a boolean? > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:216071 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
